Perpetual Beta: A theme for many Web services is the idea that software is ever evolving to meet the real-time demands of Web users. Rather than releasing scheduled software updates. Web services like Google will add features as they become available and adapt dynamically to its users requirements, which are in turn de facto testers. ~ PCAuthority Feb 06
So what if schools where perpetual?
Perpetual Schools: A theme for many educators is the idea that schools are ever evolving to meet the real-time demands of students. Rather than release scheduled theory updates. Educators like Google will add features as they become available and adapt dynamically to their students requirements, which are in turn de facto testers.
How about a little educational decoding:
Ever evolving = continual improvement
Release scheduled theory updates = In-services
Adapt dynamically to their students requirements = differentiated instruction
Isnt this what we want from our schools, from our educators? Wouldnt we all like to believe that teachers have the support and encouragement to run a perpetual classroom? One that is constantly using new methods, fixing or tweaking lessons, and continually trying to improve? If you truly ran a perpetual classroom you would never use the same lesson twice. The lesson would be continually adapted, fixed, and improved based on what the learner needed. In a perpetual classroom, there is no filing cabinet of already made lesson plans, there might be a skeleton of a lesson plan that has been used before. But each one must be updated and adapted to the new methods and tools available to both the educator and the learner.
Some people might not be able to stomach the thought of students being testers, but lets not kid ourselves, that is what they are in todays system. We test them with every lesson we teach. We try teaching them and then test them to see if our teaching worked. They are testers testing our teaching. What if we turned our students into perpetual learners?
Perpetual Learner: A theory of many that students need to be ever evolving to meet the demands of the 21st century. Rather than release knowledge to students as schedule classes. Learners like Google will learn information as it becomes available and adapt dynamically to its new requirements, which are in turn tested by the learner.
This puts the learner in control of their learning. They are no longer testers but test makers. They are free to use the information around them to adapt and apply their learning to a new situation. They then test their new found information against others, fixing the bugs, tweaking their thoughts, until a new version is released, which then starts the process all over again. This is the learner of the 21st century, a learner who is perpetually learning.
10 Comments
Pingback: Mc’Blog » A Perpetual Classroom?
Pingback: Great Question at pedersondesigns
Pingback: 2 Cents Worth » Perpetual Beta Education
Pingback: Fear of the unknown at The Thinking Stick
Pingback: Washington State doing it right! at The Thinking Stick
Pingback: Perpetual Education = Perpetual Learning at The Thinking Stick
Jeff, This is a fabulous idea. However, I think that there needs to be some kind of agreement, or consensus, about what kind of information is important. Or else, every individual could simply pick the topics to discuss/think about that he/she wanted to discuss/think about. I’ve started a new social network site on which this type of a conversation might take place. The address is: http://classdiscussions.ning.com
Pingback: Blogs as Web-Based Portfolios
Pingback: Google, Android, and the Future | The Thinking Stick
Pingback: The Wave of Information | COETAIL Online Cohort 2012-2013