<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Thoughts: Monday at NECC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thethinkingstick.com/my-thoughts-monday-at-necc/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thethinkingstick.com/my-thoughts-monday-at-necc/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=my-thoughts-monday-at-necc</link>
	<description>Educator Consultant Author</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:34:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blueprint &#187; Blog Archive &#187; user categories</title>
		<link>http://www.thethinkingstick.com/my-thoughts-monday-at-necc/#comment-1849</link>
		<dc:creator>Blueprint &#187; Blog Archive &#187; user categories</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thethinkingstick.com/?p=540#comment-1849</guid>
		<description>[...] Spectators is one category I would assume is under counting. Many people, particularly older users, read blogs without even knowing they are a &#8216;blog&#8217;. This is not necessarily a big  problem in my view - Blogs as a concept are becoming far more amorphous. Blogs can now refer to: personal diary, professional communication, organizational communication, social networking, journalistic column, and many others. Really the only thing that connects all those threads is the underlying technology. It is important that people be able to evaluate the validity of an information source but it seems to me that knowing if a website you are reading is a Blog is not necessarily even that helpful in making that judgment. What this does point to is making sure that students have the skills to be able to make quick and apt judgments about how &#8216;cite worthy&#8217; and URL is. via Thinking Stick  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Spectators is one category I would assume is under counting. Many people, particularly older users, read blogs without even knowing they are a &#8216;blog&#8217;. This is not necessarily a big  problem in my view &#8211; Blogs as a concept are becoming far more amorphous. Blogs can now refer to: personal diary, professional communication, organizational communication, social networking, journalistic column, and many others. Really the only thing that connects all those threads is the underlying technology. It is important that people be able to evaluate the validity of an information source but it seems to me that knowing if a website you are reading is a Blog is not necessarily even that helpful in making that judgment. What this does point to is making sure that students have the skills to be able to make quick and apt judgments about how &#8216;cite worthy&#8217; and URL is. via Thinking Stick  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Change Agency - Advocating a better education system for the 21st Century. &#187; links for 2007-06-27</title>
		<link>http://www.thethinkingstick.com/my-thoughts-monday-at-necc/#comment-1848</link>
		<dc:creator>Change Agency - Advocating a better education system for the 21st Century. &#187; links for 2007-06-27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 02:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thethinkingstick.com/?p=540#comment-1848</guid>
		<description>[...] My Thoughts: Monday at NECC at The Thinking Stick Jeff Utecht&#8217;s thoughts from Monday at NECC &#8212; definitely some &#8220;food for thought&#8221;   (tags: web2.0 edtech education learning NECC07 NECC2007 instructional-technology) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My Thoughts: Monday at NECC at The Thinking Stick Jeff Utecht&#8217;s thoughts from Monday at NECC &#8212; definitely some &#8220;food for thought&#8221;   (tags: web2.0 edtech education learning NECC07 NECC2007 instructional-technology) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The TechKnow Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.thethinkingstick.com/my-thoughts-monday-at-necc/#comment-1847</link>
		<dc:creator>The TechKnow Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thethinkingstick.com/?p=540#comment-1847</guid>
		<description>[...] enjoyed Jeff Utecht&#8217;s post this morning - makes me want to get going on twitter (I guess I have to get some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] enjoyed Jeff Utecht&#8217;s post this morning &#8211; makes me want to get going on twitter (I guess I have to get some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudia Ceraso</title>
		<link>http://www.thethinkingstick.com/my-thoughts-monday-at-necc/#comment-1846</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudia Ceraso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thethinkingstick.com/?p=540#comment-1846</guid>
		<description>Jeff,
Is this the post you mentioned (tweeted) that it took you two hours to write? What a read! Thank you for your time.

Following the note-blogging of our Twitter contacts I read over and over: &quot;If we do not risk losing our job, then we are not doing our job&quot;. I think this post takes the idea further. From results to process. Konrad just blogged about it too (assessment point of view)
http://www.teachandlearn.ca/blog/2007/06/24/june-is-the-cruellest-month/


Your reading of the stats exemplifies the literacy we should aim at. We have learnt how to produce content and we cannot read &quot;results&quot; the way we used to anymore. Learning is elsewhere.

Karyn hits the mark. How do we know what will be successful before trying? This is the shift that meets all the resistance. Making all our teaching more like shared learning.

How should we talk about all this to school authorities?
Hmmm.Your post takes me back to this post of mine:
http://eltnotes.blogspot.com/2007/03/blogging-matters.html
Maybe I should review it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,<br />
Is this the post you mentioned (tweeted) that it took you two hours to write? What a read! Thank you for your time.</p>
<p>Following the note-blogging of our Twitter contacts I read over and over: &#8220;If we do not risk losing our job, then we are not doing our job&#8221;. I think this post takes the idea further. From results to process. Konrad just blogged about it too (assessment point of view)<br />
<a href="http://www.teachandlearn.ca/blog/2007/06/24/june-is-the-cruellest-month/" rel="nofollow">http://www.teachandlearn.ca/blog/2007/06/24/june-is-the-cruellest-month/</a></p>
<p>Your reading of the stats exemplifies the literacy we should aim at. We have learnt how to produce content and we cannot read &#8220;results&#8221; the way we used to anymore. Learning is elsewhere.</p>
<p>Karyn hits the mark. How do we know what will be successful before trying? This is the shift that meets all the resistance. Making all our teaching more like shared learning.</p>
<p>How should we talk about all this to school authorities?<br />
Hmmm.Your post takes me back to this post of mine:<br />
<a href="http://eltnotes.blogspot.com/2007/03/blogging-matters.html" rel="nofollow">http://eltnotes.blogspot.com/2007/03/blogging-matters.html</a><br />
Maybe I should review it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karyn Romeis</title>
		<link>http://www.thethinkingstick.com/my-thoughts-monday-at-necc/#comment-1845</link>
		<dc:creator>Karyn Romeis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thethinkingstick.com/?p=540#comment-1845</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why are we afraid of failure?&quot; Good question!

In my MA class, we keep coming back to this issue. As a society, we have become so results focused that it&#039;s not about the process anymore. There is no room for effort that does not lead to success. But how do you know beforehand whether effort will lead to success or failure? Perhaps the independent thinkers (those less swayed by societal pressure) continue pretty much as they did before, but I fear the less brave souls are just giving up. We no longer have room for the creative approach. Ken Robinson addressed this at TED in June 2006. (&lt;a&gt;http://www.ted.com/index.php/speakers/view/id/69&lt;/a&gt;)

It&#039;s a worrying approach that is eroding perseverance and strength of character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why are we afraid of failure?&#8221; Good question!</p>
<p>In my MA class, we keep coming back to this issue. As a society, we have become so results focused that it&#8217;s not about the process anymore. There is no room for effort that does not lead to success. But how do you know beforehand whether effort will lead to success or failure? Perhaps the independent thinkers (those less swayed by societal pressure) continue pretty much as they did before, but I fear the less brave souls are just giving up. We no longer have room for the creative approach. Ken Robinson addressed this at TED in June 2006. (<a>http://www.ted.com/index.php/speakers/view/id/69</a>)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a worrying approach that is eroding perseverance and strength of character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudia Ceraso</title>
		<link>http://www.thethinkingstick.com/my-thoughts-monday-at-necc/#comment-1850</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudia Ceraso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 08:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thethinkingstick.com/?p=540#comment-1850</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;@jutecht Two hours to write it? Slow-blogging suits you. Great read. http://www.thethinkingstick.com/?p=540&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">@jutecht Two hours to write it? Slow-blogging suits you. Great read. <a href="http://www.thethinkingstick.com/?p=540" rel="nofollow">http://www.thethinkingstick.com/?p=540</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

