Comments on: Bloom’s Taxonomy Revisited http://www.thethinkingstick.com/blooms-taxonomy-revisited Jeff Utecht - Bangkok, Thailand Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:47:21 +0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: 教育学界定学校2.0 | 教育中文翻译 http://www.thethinkingstick.com/blooms-taxonomy-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-24681 教育学界定学校2.0 | 教育中文翻译 Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:02:20 +0000 http://thethinkingstick.com/?p=400#comment-24681 [...] 我喜欢这个说法，对我而言，这是学校1.5，技术取代了我们所做的事情而已。这不是新学校，而是翻修了的学校。新学校应该从新教学法、新理论，甚至新的学习分类法开始。学校2.0不是学校1.0的升级版本……它是全新的学校。学校1.0的升级就好象用文字处理代替手写，或者用演示文稿代替海报一样。这些是旧系统的更新。学校2.0要的是焕然一新……从我们教学实践的基础开始（大学们，你们在听吗？） 然而，要到达学校2.0，基础技术设施必须到位。没有工具，我们就无法改变教学法，无法调整新的分类法和新理论。我相信这正是我们开始行动的阶段。在过去10年，我们一直在创建学校1.5。随着我们的创建，基础设施需要转向新的教学方式。 在迈向学校2.0中，Chris的科学领导学院, Tim的小学和Dr. Tyson的中学是三个很好的范例。正如这三所学校所证明的，迈向学校2.0，首先要从领导开始。 [...] [...] 我喜欢这个说法，对我而言，这是学校1.5，技术取代了我们所做的事情而已。这不是新学校，而是翻修了的学校。新学校应该从新教学法、新理论，甚至新的学习分类法开始。学校2.0不是学校1.0的升级版本……它是全新的学校。学校1.0的升级就好象用文字处理代替手写，或者用演示文稿代替海报一样。这些是旧系统的更新。学校2.0要的是焕然一新……从我们教学实践的基础开始（大学们，你们在听吗？） 然而，要到达学校2.0，基础技术设施必须到位。没有工具，我们就无法改变教学法，无法调整新的分类法和新理论。我相信这正是我们开始行动的阶段。在过去10年，我们一直在创建学校1.5。随着我们的创建，基础设施需要转向新的教学方式。 在迈向学校2.0中，Chris的科学领导学院, Tim的小学和Dr. Tyson的中学是三个很好的范例。正如这三所学校所证明的，迈向学校2.0，首先要从领导开始。 [...]

]]> By: Higher Edison http://www.thethinkingstick.com/blooms-taxonomy-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-21156 Higher Edison Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:45:11 +0000 http://thethinkingstick.com/?p=400#comment-21156 <strong>secret life of blogs ...</strong> Will Richardson's post The Next Generation of Teachers inspired a cascade of comments. For Dean Shareski at Ideas and Thoughts, this outpouring is a good reminder:Comments may be the most underrated component of a blog. For me, they breathe life... secret life of blogs …

Will Richardson’s post The Next Generation of Teachers inspired a cascade of comments. For Dean Shareski at Ideas and Thoughts, this outpouring is a good reminder:Comments may be the most underrated component of a blog. For me, they breathe life…

]]> By: Pedagogy defines School 2.0 at The Thinking Stick http://www.thethinkingstick.com/blooms-taxonomy-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-16686 Pedagogy defines School 2.0 at The Thinking Stick Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:37:07 +0000 http://thethinkingstick.com/?p=400#comment-16686 [...] In order to get to school 2.0 however, a technology infrastructure needs to be in place. We can not change our pedagogy and adapt these new taxonomies and new theories if we do not have the tools to do so. I believe that is the phase we are now moving out of. For the past 10 years we have been creating school 1.5. As we built the infrastructure needed to move to a new way of teaching and learning. [...] [...] In order to get to school 2.0 however, a technology infrastructure needs to be in place. We can not change our pedagogy and adapt these new taxonomies and new theories if we do not have the tools to do so. I believe that is the phase we are now moving out of. For the past 10 years we have been creating school 1.5. As we built the infrastructure needed to move to a new way of teaching and learning. [...]

]]> By: Lynne Crowe http://www.thethinkingstick.com/blooms-taxonomy-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-16642 Lynne Crowe Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:06:42 +0000 http://thethinkingstick.com/?p=400#comment-16642 Great post. The ideas you have presented regarding higher order thinking skills is what our school started focussing on last year. We will continue to build on these this year. I totally agree with you when you say "I would say that education is still focused on the lower-order skills of 1. Remembering 2. Understanding and 3. Applying. When our students, in their personal lives, are already at a level 6. Creating, they come to schools where they feel ‘dumb downed’ or disconnected." Unfortunately the solution doesn't just lie with the classroom teacher but also with school management - availability and access to the tools. As for Blooms taxonomy, I would like to see Create and Evaluation sitting side by side as you need to evaluate or reflect after creating. Great post. The ideas you have presented regarding higher order thinking skills is what our school started focussing on last year. We will continue to build on these this year. I totally agree with you when you say
“I would say that education is still focused on the lower-order skills of 1. Remembering 2. Understanding and 3. Applying. When our students, in their personal lives, are already at a level 6. Creating, they come to schools where they feel ‘dumb downed’ or disconnected.”
Unfortunately the solution doesn’t just lie with the classroom teacher but also with school management – availability and access to the tools.
As for Blooms taxonomy, I would like to see Create and Evaluation sitting side by side as you need to evaluate or reflect after creating.

]]> By: Floyd Geasland http://www.thethinkingstick.com/blooms-taxonomy-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-16630 Floyd Geasland Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:43:33 +0000 http://thethinkingstick.com/?p=400#comment-16630 Personally I think that Synthesis should still be under Evaluation, but the “pure” definition of synthesis – combining two known things to create a new use or purpose. Then Create should be above Evaluation –defined as making new constructs to fulfill a new use or purpose, not using an old thing in a different way. I know many of my peers feel the two things are the same thing, but I don’t think that is true. Personally I think that Synthesis should still be under Evaluation, but the “pure” definition of synthesis – combining two known things to create a new use or purpose. Then Create should be above Evaluation –defined as making new constructs to fulfill a new use or purpose, not using an old thing in a different way. I know many of my peers feel the two things are the same thing, but I don’t think that is true.

]]>